Works Cited

  • Coen-Sanchez, Karine, et al. “Repercussions of Overturning Roe v. Wade for Women across Systems and beyond Borders.” Reproductive Health, vol. 19, no. 184, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y.
  • Gold, Martin E. “The Demise of Roe v. Wade Undermines Freedom of Religion.” American Constitution Society, 30 Aug. 2022. https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/the-demise-of-roe-v-wade-undermines-freedom-of-religion/.
  • Montanaro, Domenico. “Poll: Majorities Oppose Supreme Court’s Abortion Ruling and Worry about Other Rights.” NPR, 27 June 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/27/1107733632.
  • Taddonio, Patrice. “‘Roe v. Wade’ Appears Poised to Fall. These Documentaries Show How We Got Here.” PBS Frontline, 3 May 2022. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/supreme-court-likely-overturn-roe-v-wade-leaked-draft-5-abortion-documentaries/.
  • “Roe v. Wade and Supreme Court Abortion Cases.” Brennan Center for Justice, 28 Sept. 2022. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/roe-v-wade-and-supreme-court-abortion-cases.
  • Durkheim, Emile. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by W.D. Halls, Free Press, 1997. [For Structural Functionalism]
  • Berger, Peter L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Anchor Books, 1967. [For Secularism]
  • Marx, Karl. “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” Translated by Martin Milligan, Progress Publishers, 1959. [For Materialism]
  • Collins, Randall. Four Sociological Traditions. Oxford University Press, 1994. [Theoretical context for all three frameworks]